Search found 60 matches
- Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:48 pm
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v1.0
- Topic: Missing Question Mark using DataCodings.Default
- Replies: 7
- Views: 16209
Re: Missing Question Mark using DataCodings.Default
Further information: I used the original [DataCodings.Default], but encoded the message using my own GSMEncode function and passed the bytes to [SmppClient.PrepareSubmit], the received message correctly displayed the ? character as well as all the other characters - could this character have been mi...
- Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:39 pm
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v1.0
- Topic: Missing Question Mark using DataCodings.Default
- Replies: 7
- Views: 16209
Re: Missing Question Mark using DataCodings.Default
Using:
MapEncoding(DataCodings.Default, System.Text.Encoding.Default)
The message received at the handset is now missing the following characters:
[]{}^|\:
(the question mark was displayed though!)
MapEncoding(DataCodings.Default, System.Text.Encoding.Default)
The message received at the handset is now missing the following characters:
[]{}^|\:
(the question mark was displayed though!)
- Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:53 pm
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v1.0
- Topic: Missing Question Mark using DataCodings.Default
- Replies: 7
- Views: 16209
Missing Question Mark using DataCodings.Default
Hi Alt, (Using Inetlab.SMPP v1.0.11.1) I am using the coding [DataCodings.Default] within [SmppClient.PrepareSubmit] to send the following message: TEST []{}?@'-_!£$%^&*()_-=+,./<>|\àèïôû TEST The handset receives: TEST []{}@'-_!£$%^&*()_-=+,./<>|\àèïôû TEST It is missing the ? character. Could this...
- Thu May 12, 2011 7:24 pm
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v1.0
- Topic: DeliverSM & Receipt issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8616
DeliverSM & Receipt issue
Hi Alexey I have found a couple of issues with [Receipt.cs] Parse(string text) doesn't catch 'ENROUTE'. Also, I use the provider mBlox who returns 'ACKED' as a status, which I guess is another 'ENROUTE' designation. Frustratingly, when accessing the whole receipt you rebuild it using the items you'v...
- Mon May 09, 2011 10:00 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v1.0
- Topic: Keep SMPP connection open with SMSC
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6289
Re: Keep SMPP connection open with SMSC
Absolutely yes, SMSC's recommend you maintain an open connection and get upset when you attempt to bind for every message send. EnquireLink was designed to keep a small conversation going between you and the provider so you're both aware whether a connection is still valid or not.
- Wed Sep 29, 2010 3:16 pm
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: Modifying Sender ID
- Replies: 1
- Views: 32957
Hi Ash, You can specify an Alphanumeric SrcAddr. When you call SubmitSm make sure you set: SrcTon = Enum_TON.Alphanumeric '(enum definition below) Be aware that the networks support a maximum length of 11 characters for this, depending on your SMSC it will either return an error if you try to use a ...
- Wed Sep 29, 2010 3:00 pm
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: PURCHASE
- Replies: 10
- Views: 92994
Any question you may have about implementation has probably already been asked and answered on this board. As Alt says, you get the entire source code for the SMPP library after you pay for the license, even if you don't like the product after purchase the fee is well worth it to view some excellent...
- Mon May 10, 2010 7:24 am
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: Socket.Send freeze under load ?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14093
Re: Socket.Send freeze under load ?
Is this some kind of synchronization issue ? Deadlock ? I'd have to say yes, as I haven't experienced the behaviour you mention. How much work are you doing in the events? To ensure stability under severe load I adopted the following within my code: 1) Do not perform any work directly on the receiv...
- Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:37 am
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: SMPPclient connects and disconnects with ESME_RBindFail
- Replies: 13
- Views: 32466
- Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:15 pm
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: SMPPclient connects and disconnects with ESME_RBindFail
- Replies: 13
- Views: 32466
- Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:13 am
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: SMPPclient connects and disconnects with ESME_RBindFail
- Replies: 13
- Views: 32466
Is your Linux based app currently bound when you attempt to bind via this component? Does the troublesome telco support SMPP v3.4? I had trouble binding with one of my providers and it turned out to be my IP address wasn't on the allow list for the SMPP server I was binding to - get your provider to...
- Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:26 pm
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: Error While Receiving Sms (evDeliverSm)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8156
Hi, Are you running your application as a windows form, and have you placed any initialisation code in the form load/startup events within the form that may start communicating with SMPP *BEFORE* the form is fully loaded? If so, I would recommend you pull the code from the form startup events and pl...
- Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:14 am
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: GSM mobile phone
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8201
Hi Racheliya,
This is a forum specifically for information relating to the ALT.SMS.SmppClient class library.
That said, try this link for a resource which may help you http://www.filesaveas.com/gprsconnect.html
Regards
Nick
This is a forum specifically for information relating to the ALT.SMS.SmppClient class library.
That said, try this link for a resource which may help you http://www.filesaveas.com/gprsconnect.html
Regards
Nick
- Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:32 pm
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: More serializable types required
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10997
- Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:54 am
- Forum: ALT.SMS.SmppClient
- Topic: More serializable types required
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10997
Re: More serializable types required
Hi
DeliverSm reports "Object reference not set to an instance of an object" whenever an attempt is made to serialize it. (v2.6.0.0)
DeliverSm reports "Object reference not set to an instance of an object" whenever an attempt is made to serialize it. (v2.6.0.0)